FCC Seeking More Comment on Allowing VoIP Providers Direct Access to Numbers

With new access charge obligations for interconnected VoIP, new contribution obligations for non-interconnected VoIP, and possible outage reporting requirements, 2012 is shaping up as a year of changes for VoIP providers.  Another possible change may be in store for how VoIP providers obtain access to telephone numbers.

Since 2005, various petitions have been pending seeking a waiver of FCC rules to allow interconnected VoIP providers to obtain direct access to numbering resources through the North American Numbering Plan Administrator and the Pooling Administrator.  In March 2011, Vonage renewed its request for waiver and submitted supplemental information in support of its request.  Shortly after Christmas, the FCC released a Public Notice seeking comment on Vonage's filing and its supplemental materials.  With a brief extension granted, the comments are due on January 25. 

VoIP providers and CLECs serving VoIP providers should monitor this docket closely.

Telecom Law Monitor Feature: Regulatory Requirements for VoIP Services

Our post about the unique enforcement posture of interconnected VoIP quickly became the most popular post on the Telecom Law Monitor.  One person asked if we could elaborate on the differences in regulatory treatment between traditional telecom services, interconnected VoIP and non-interconnected VoIP (like Skype).   In response, we prepared a chart comparing applicability of the major telecom obligations to both types of VoIP.

As the chart shows, the FCC has imposed many telecom obligations on interconnected VoIP on an individual basis.  In each instance, the FCC relied upon its ancillary authority to impose the obligation, even if it were ultimately to classify interconnected VoIP an information service.  In a few instances, the FCC has not -- yet at least -- imposed a telecom obligation on interconnected VoIP.  VoIP services that do not meet the FCC's definition of "interconnected VoIP" are not subject to any of the telecom service requirements today. 

DISCLAIMER: This chart is for informational purposes only and is not intended to serve as legal advice or a comprehensive review of regulatory obligations.  With that in mind, you may view the chart here.

FCC Open Meeting Recap

The FCC took a flurry of actions at yesterday's monthly open meeting.  Fulfilling this blog's role as your resource for news and helpful links, below is your guide to yesterday's actions.

Wireless Market Report:  The  Commission adopted its 14th Annual Report on the state of the wireless market.  Among other things, this report was controversial because it refused to make an "effective competition" judgment on the wireless market.  The report also expands coverage beyond CMRS to address the broader mobile marketplace. 

Number Porting:  The Commission released a Report and Order shortening the time interval for "simple" ports.  This action will particularly affect wireline-to-wireless ports, and might accelerate the trend of "cut the cord" conversions.

Pole Attachments:  The Commission made a number of changes to its rules governing the rights of cable and competitive telecommunications providers to hang facilities on utility poles.  The order also proposes a number of changes to the pole attachment complaint rules.

Universal Service:  The Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to modify its "e-rate" rules, which support discounts for schools and libraries for internet access and other services. 

Broadband Spectrum:  The Commission adopted rules to make available another 25 MHz of spectrum for mobile braodband use. 

REMINDER:  For more information on many of these topics, peruse our links on the right hand side of this page. 

Preview of FCC Open Meeting: VoIP, Number Porting Items are on the Agenda

Late last night, the FCC announced its agenda for its May 13 Open Meeting. Highlighting the agenda are items relating to VoIP provider discontinuance obligations and LNP deadlines.

VoIP

The FCC announced that it plans to “consider a Report and Order concerning the requirements of interconnected VoIP providers when discontinuing service.”  This is sort of a stealth item on the agenda, as there has been virtually no discussion in the docket on this issue in the most recent months.

We hear that the FCC is likely to impose notice requirements similar to those that apply for traditional telecommunications carriers. This will continue a trend for interconnected VoIP where the FCC has imposed, one-by-one, obligations traditionally held by telecommunications carriers while steadfastly refusing to classify interconnected VoIP services. In today’s state of affairs, interconnected VoIP has nearly all of the burdens of regulation but few of the benefits. The most significant outstanding issue continues to be the application of access charges to interconnected VoIP. This topic has been a subject of litigation for some time.

Number Porting

The FCC will address porting intervals and related standards for the transfer of telephone numbers between carriers when a customer switches service providers. Cable providers in particular are pushing for a maximum interval of one-day for simple wireline to wireline and intermodal porting requests. The Order could also further address the information that carriers may require in order to implement a porting request, response intervals for customer service requests (CSRs) and other concerns raised regarding fair competition among providers.